uksocialcontract

exposing freeman nonsense

Mixed-up malarky

Freemanism is well mixed-up.

I suggest that Freeman-types have quick read up on Leo Strauss. It will leave your head spinning and you will know the meaning of cognitive dissonance. It will hurt.

Andrew Le Sueur: Crazy constitutionalism

A useful if limited position on the UK and lack of a legal basis for Freemanism. Some comments are worth reading too…

UK Constitutional Law Association

I’m reading David Aaronovitch’s Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History (2009). It’s excellent, but although it makes passing reference to conspiracy theories about the European Union it says nothing about one that deals with the foundations of the British constitutional system.

Sunstein and Vermeule have defined a conspiracy theory as ‘an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who attempt to conceal their role (at least until their aims are accomplished)’: see (2009) 17(2) The Journal of Political Philosophy202, 205. Of course, some conspiracy theories – defined in this way – are both justified and true. What concerns me are those that are unjustified and false. In a bewildering, uncertain and unfair world, where participation in and respect for organised politics is declining and public understanding of the constitution and law is poor…

View original post 1,071 more words